| |
The Martin Wight Memorial Trust
Martin Wight: A Biographical Overview of his Life and Work
by Ian Hall, School of History and Politics, University of Adelaide.
- Footnotes -
[1] Pitt, ‘Wight, (Robert James) Martin
(1913-1972)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography,
online edition.
[2] Hedley Bull, ‘Introduction: Martin
Wight and the study of international relations’, in Wight,
Systems of States ed. Hedley Bull (Leicester: Leicester
University Press, 1977), p. 3.
[3] Bull, ‘Martin Wight and the study
of international relations’, p. 3.
[4] During the inter-war period, a single
lecturer was employed by the College to assist the Woodrow Wilson
Professor with his teaching duties.
[5] Brian Porter, ‘E. H. Carr –
The Aberystwyth Years, 1936-47’, in Michael Cox (ed.), E.
H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004),
p. 53. The successful applicant, favoured by Carr, was Hugh Seton-Watson.
[6] Bull, ‘Martin Wight and the study
of international relations’, p. 3.
[7] Wight, ‘Christian Pacifism’,
Theology 33:193 (July 1936), pp. 12-21.
[8] Bull (op. cit.) dates Wight’s employment
at Chatham House from 1936 to 1938. However, Wight to Toynbee, 13
October, 1954, Toynbee MSS 86, Bodleian Library, Oxford,
states that Wight joined Chatham House in the spring of 1937. See
The Republic of South Africa (London: Oxford University
Press, 1937), The Political and Strategic Interests of the United
Kingdom (London: Oxford University Press, 1938) and H. V. Hodson
(ed.), The British Empire: A Report on its Structure and Problems
(London: Oxford University Press, 1937). Hedley Bull, in ‘Martin
Wight and the study of international relations’, argues that
Wight also worked on the Surveys, and contributed to Toynbee’s
Study. It is more plausible that this work was done after
rather than before the Second World War (1946-49).
[9] Wight to Toynbee, 13 October 1954, Toynbee
MSS 86. On the broader intellectual relationship between the
two, see Ian Hall, ‘Challenge and Response: The Lasting Engagement
of Arnold J. Toynbee and Martin Wight’, International
Relations 17:3 (2003), pp. 389-404.
[10] Laski to Wight, 26 December 1938, Wight
MSS 233 3/9, British Library of Political and Economic Sciences,
London.
[11] It should be noted that Wight probably
need not have taken this stand: he was in a ‘reserved occupation’
and suffered from chronic asthma. See Pitt to Bull, 2 April 1974,
Wight MSS 250. Parts of Wight’s application are reproduced
in Bull, ‘Martin Wight and the study of international relations’,
p. 4, and Dunne, Inventing International Society, p. 65,
note 23.
[12] Pitt, ‘Wight, (Robert James) Martin
(1913-1972)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography,
online version.
[13] For some of the details of this position,
see Bull to Butterfield, 19 March, 1976, Butterfield MSS 531(i)/
B191, Cambridge University Library.
[14] Wight, The Development of the Legislative
Council 1606-1945 vol. I (London: Faber & Faber, 1946);
The Gold Coast Legislative Council (London: Faber &
Faber, 1947); British Colonial Constitutions (London: Clarendon,
1952).
[15] At this time it seems that Charles Manning
made an unsuccessful bid to bring Wight to the LSE, but he was unable
to create a new Readership in his Department. See Manning to Bull,
11 April 1974, Wight MSS 250.
[16] Power Politics Looking Forward
Pamphlet no. 8 (London: RIIA, 1946).
[17] Richard Cockett, David Astor and
the Observer (London: André Deutsch, 1991), p. 148.
[18] Susan Strange (1923-1998) later became
one of the most influential British scholars on international political
economy and Montague Burton Professor of International Relations
at the London School of Economics from 1978 to 1988.
[19] Wight, ‘Spain and Portugal’,
‘Switzerland, The Low Countries, and Scandinavia’, ‘Eastern
Europe’, ‘Germany’ & ‘The Balance of
Power’ in A. J. Toynbee & F. T. Ashton-Gwatkin (eds.)
Survey of International Affairs 1939-1946: The World in March
1939 (London: Oxford University Press, 1952), pp.138-150, pp.
151-165, pp. 206-292, pp. 293-365 & pp. 508-532. Toynbee, Study
of History, VII, p. 396, note 3, p. 415, note 5, p. 428, note
2, pp. 456-457, note 3, p. 460, notes 1 & 4, p. 464, note 1,
p. 488, note 2, p. 489, note 3, p. 505, note 2, p. 543, note 1,
pp. 711-715. See also Wight’s ‘The Crux for an Historian
brought up in the Christian Tradition’, pp. 737-748.
[20] ‘Our Christian Position in the
Face of the Conflict between Russia and the West’, Wight MSS
10.
[21] Wight, ‘The Church, Russia and
the West’, A Ecumenical Review: A Quarterly, 1:1
(Autumn 1948), pp. 25-45.
[22] See Wight MSS 232. Wight attended
the second meeting of the ‘Ecumenical Commission on European
Co-operation’, 19-20 May 1950, at Bièvres in France.
[23] W. Arthur Lewis, Michael Scott, Colin
Legum & Martin Wight, Attitude to Africa (Harmondsworth:
Penguin, 1951).
[24] Cockett, David Astor and the Observer,
p. 187.
[25] See‘What is International Relations?’
(1950), Wight MSS 112.
[26] See Ian Hall, The International Thought
of Martin Wight (New York: Palgrave, 2006), pp. 88-97.
[27] Harold J. Laski, An Introduction
to Politics, new ed. prepared by Martin Wight (London: George
Allen & Unwin, 1951). The bulk of the revisions were to chapter
four, ‘The State and the International Community’, pp.
88-105; ‘History and Judgment: Butterfield, Niebuhr and the
Technical Historian’, The Frontier 1:8 (1950), pp.
301-314; ‘What Makes a Good Historian?’, The Listener,
53:1355 (17 February 1955), pp. 283-284; ‘War and International
Politics’, The Listener 54:1389 (13 October 1955)
pp. 584-585; ‘The Power Struggle within the United Nations’,
Proceedings of the Institute of World Affairs 33rd session
(Los Angeles: USC, 1956), pp. 247-259; ‘Why is there no International
Theory?’, International Relations 2 (1960), pp. 35-48;
‘Brutus in Foreign Policy: The Memoirs of Sir Anthony Eden’,
International Affairs 36:3 (1960), pp. 299-309.
[28] Wight to Morgenthau, undated draft (January
1956), Wight MSS 103. The lectures were later reconstructed and
published as Wight, International Theory: The Three Traditions
ed. Gabriele Wight & Brian Porter (Leicester & London: RIIA
& Leicester University Press, 1991).
[29] Bullock to Wight, 9 July 1955 & Wight
to Bullock, 17 July 1955, both in Wight MSS 233 1/9.
[30] See Wight MSS 32.
[31] Wight to Grodzins, 27 May 1957, Wight
MSS 103.
[32] Wight, ‘Why is there no International
Theory?’, ‘Western Values in International Relations’
& ‘The Balance of Power’ in Butterfield & Wight
(eds.), Diplomatic Investigations, pp. 17-34, pp. 89-131
& pp. 149-175.
[33] Wight, ‘University of Sussex’,
1960, Wight MSS 233 7/9.
[34] Asa Briggs, ‘Drawing a New Map
of Learning’, in David Daiches (ed.), The Idea of a New
University: The Experiment in Sussex (London: André
Deutsch, 1964), p. 61.
[35] Wight, ‘European Studies’,
in Daiches, Idea of a New University, p. 110.
[36] Wight ‘International Legitimacy’,
reprinted in Systems of States, pp. 153-173; ‘The
Balance of Power and International Order’, in Alan James (ed.),
The Bases of International Order: Essays in honour of C. A.
W. Manning (London: OUP, 1973), pp. 85-115. For an examination
of this shift, see Hall, International Thought of Martin Wight,
pp. 151-156.
[37] Wight, Power Politics ed. Hedley
Bull & Carsten Holbraad (Leicester and London: RIIA & Leicester
University Press, 1995 [1978]).
[38] ‘Is the Commonwealth a Non-Hobbesian
Institution?’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative
Politics 26: 2 (1978), pp. 119-135; ‘An Anatomy of International
Thought’, Review of International Studies 13 (1987),
pp. 221-227. See also Wight’s ‘On the Abolition of War:
Observations on a Memorandum by Walter Mills’, in Harry Bauer
& Elizabeth Brighi (eds.), International Relations at the
LSE: A History of 75 Years (London: Millennium Publishing Group,
2003), pp. 51-60.
[39] Wight, International Theory: The
Three Traditions ed. Gabriele Wight & Brian Porter (London:
Leicester University Press, 1991).
[40] Wight, Four Seminal Thinkers in International
Theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini ed. Gabriele
Wight & Brian Porter (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
|
|